As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases from

RED Takes Authorized Motion Towards Nikon Over RAW Patents

RED has not too long ago filed a lawsuit in opposition to Nikon, accusing the Japanese firm of infringing their notorious compressed RAW patent. In line with the American firm, the addition of inner RAW codecs to the Nikon Z 9 intentionally emulates their compression know-how.

A couple of weeks in the past, we have been fairly excited to report concerning the launch of firmware V2.0 for the Nikon Z 9. Formally obtainable for obtain since April twentieth, the replace provides the flexibility to internally document 12-bit N-RAW as much as 8.3K60 and even ProRes RAW HQ as much as 4.1K60. Nonetheless, it seems just like the occasion is (nearly) over.

Certainly, RED has not too long ago filed a lawsuit in opposition to the Japanese firm for infringing their notorious compressed RAW patent. Its not clear whether or not the 2 firms will find yourself in courtroom and/or Nikon should take away the long-awaited RAW codecs from the Z 9. What’s sure is that the battle is now open.

Nikon Z 9. Supply: Nikon

RED sues Nikon for including RAW video codecs to the Z 9

Historical past tends to repeat itself. The truth is, it’s not the primary time that RED takes authorized motion in opposition to opponents for infringing its personal video compression patents. In current instances, Kinefinity was compelled to take away CinemaDNG from their cameras. In addition they gave up on the event of their very own KRW2.0 codec. Furthermore, for a similar motive ProRes RAW by no means made it to the DJI Ronin 4D, though this characteristic had been beforehand introduced by the producer.

RED’s lawsuit. Supply:

The addition of inner N-RAW (which relies on intoPix’s TicoRAW) and ProRes RAW recording had been recognized for the reason that preliminary launch of the Nikon Z 9. Though the announcement was fairly stunning, we initially thought the corporate had discovered a wise workaround to avoid RED’s patent. Apparently, this courageous try has failed.


Good or dangerous for the business?

Positive, enterprise is enterprise and the American firm rightfully protects its personal innovations. Nonetheless, to me personally it seems like this fixed long-term battle isn’t solely limiting RED’s opponents, nevertheless it’s someway slowing down the entire business slightly bit.

Then again, this case forces firms to give you ingenious options to beat challenges imposed by mental property, similar to Atomos and Blackmagic Design did with their ProRes RAW ecosystem and BRAW format respectively.

Featured picture credit score: photograph by Tingey Harm Regulation Agency on Unsplash

Did you’ve the prospect to shoot N-RAW or ProRes RAW on the Nikon Z 9? What do you consider RED’s method in regard to their compressed RAW patent? Tell us your ideas within the remark part under!

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Enable registration in settings - general
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Shopping cart